Archive for September 2010

New noise: Digital mobilization from popular culture to politics


Yesterday at HUMlab, I gave a talk with the title New noise: Digital mobilization from popular culture to politics. The full video stream is available from here. The talk is about social interaction and mobilization in online contexts, with a focus on analyzing patterns of how people interact and organize through digital tools and platforms. I am interested in how patterns of organization, knowledge exchange and informal learning taking place within the domain of popular culture are translated (or not) into the political arena.


“A dark economy’s web of desire”

A couple of months back, The Times Higher Education published a review of porn.com, a book for which I authored a chapter on the social network of users on an online adult forum. Even though my chapter is not mentioned specifically, the review is really good:


The writing style is level-headed. It is easy for the topic of online pornography to inspire a moral panic, but the contributors here never succumb to this temptation. Readers will find a wealth of information across the whole spectrum of the subject that is simply not available elsewhere. A wide range of authors contribute to this volume and it is heartening to see a number of new voices.


The full review.


#WikiLeaks and hacktivist mobilization


This video analyzes the #WikiLeaks hashtag as a site of mobilization. A version of this was presented as a paper at TNM2010, a conference held at Dublin City University gathering researchers approaching collective political action and new media from a variety of perspectives.


One step back

I am in Dublin for the TNM conference and just came across this sign in a shopping mall on Henry Street. Basically, they are offering you to pay for having your profile pictures for use on online social networks taken. Well, so much for DIY culture. One would sort of think that facebookers, tweeters and people networking through LinkedIn would also be competent users of digital cameras, webcams and such. McLuhan wrote in 1964 (Understanding media: The extensions of man) that one must realize that there is no stopping the flow and the development of new electronic media, but also made the point that all such new media and their potential uses are also being held back by the fact that people’s way of appropriating these new media is shaped by their experiences with previous media.


The student of media soon comes to expect the new media of any period whatever to be classed as pseudo by those who have acquired the patterns of earlier media, whatever they may happen to be. This would seem to be a normal, and even amiable, trait ensuring a maximal degree of social continuity and permanence amidst change and innovation. But all the conservatism in the world does not afford even a token resistance to the ecological sweep of the new electric media (McLuhan 1964/2001:216).


And surely, we still see a lot of people printing out websites on paper, calling on the phone to double check communications that have taken place online, choosing to read magazines on paper as well as digitally, etc. I definitely do some of these things myself sometimes. It is all natural that new media don’t replace the older ones right away. Instead, old and new media are layered and intertwined in increasingly complex ways. Loads of sociohistorical theories acknowledge that the development of culture will most likely take place in a sequence of two-steps-forward-and-one-step-back. Social media being part of a shopping mall photographer’s every day practice definitely represents two steps forward. But the idea that professionals should help users take their photos for these types of forums definitely represents one step back. At least.