Today, a paper that I co-authored with Maxime Lélièvre was published in Critical Studies in Media Communication. The title of the article is “In the Laboratory of Masculinity: Renegotiating Gender Subjectivities in MTV’s Jackass“. This is the article abstract:
This article presents a content analysis of all 25 episodes of the popular television series Jackass aired on MTV between 2000 and 2002 and of the two movies Jackass: The Movie (2002) and Jackass Number Two (2006). Starting with a brief discussion of white male backlash and representations of masculinity in crisis, we move on to show that the text of Jackass seems to reaffirm hegemonic masculinity while still maintaining an ambiguous position vis-à-vis the ideals of machismo and hyper-virility. This, at first hand, may appear as a paradox. Our argument, however, is that if one reads Jackass from outside of, what Judith Butler calls, ‘‘the heterosexual matrix,’’ things do not appear that paradoxical at all. Seeing that gender subjectivities are not essentially fixed or naturally given, Jackass can instead be read in terms of the symbolic struggle between different forms of masculinity within a dialectical process of change throughout history.
Today, we are presenting a new research project called DVIS – Domestic Violence and the Internet in Sweden. The goal of this project is to map how victims of domestic violence in Sweden are using the internet and social media both to find information and to connect with networks of people that they may not otherwise have access to when living in situations of domestic violence.
This project is planned over three years, and will end with a symposium to which policy makers, victim’s rights advocates, and researchers will be invited in order to start a discussion about domestic violence victims’ habits online and how we can learn from these habits so as to provide information and support to the people who need it.
One thing that we have noticed, just in the short amount of time since we have begun this project, is how much networking and conversation is going on outside of forums that are dedicated to domestic abuse support. Perhaps this is an issue of safety, as cookies to places like Post Secret, Twitter and Second Life landmarks are not as dangerous as cookies to women’s (and men’s) help organizations. Actually, PostSecret has a very interesting and active community and when postcards are posted that talk about abuse, there are often many instances of other’s ‘reporting’ or showing solidarity through telling similar accounts.
Beyond systems of support, what happens when this technology – that we argue could play an important role in providing a social network when real-world networks have been removed – is used against the victim? If the aide agency does not have a warning, will the user think of clearing – or know how to clear – the browser history? Will pictures posted on Facebook of a child’s birthday party, which the uploader thought only a select few would be able to see, but due to holes in security when commenting on something, provide a way for an abuser to find the victim’s location?
More information about the DVIS project can be found on the project’s website here.
The presentation that we will give today can be found here (in Swedish).
I am now on my way home from the international conference on Violence and Network Society: School Shootings and Social Violence in Contemporary Public Life hosted by the Department of Communciation at Helsinki University. All in all, this two-day cross disciplinary event about the mediation and communication of school shootings, terrorism and other forms of social violence was excellent. The first conference day was ended with a strong performance “About the Making of a Dangerous Individual” by British/Finnish artist Steve Pratt. I also got the chance to chat with Steve, and he gave me DVD of one of his performances relating to communicating controversial content through video, and we agreed that I should give him some comments on that from my research perspective. The second day of the conference was ended on a similarly thought provoking note with the screening of Estonian director Ilmar Raags movie “The Class“. Raag also took part in one of the conference panels.
For my own part, I managed to get in contact with a number of interesting people, most notably a group of visual researchers from Jacobs University Bremen headed by Professor Marion G. Müller, but I also had interesting conversations with the three prominent keynote speakers (Douglas Kellner, Barbie Zelizer, and Stewart Clegg) as well as with a number of other people that I plan to stay in contact with, for example Glenn Muschert and Kari-Andén Papadopoulos. My own presentation went really well, and there seemed to be a large interest in the methods I have used. In the sessions I attended, I particularly enjoyed the presentation on “Violence, Victims and Emotionality in Finnish Crime-Appeal Programming” by Mirka Smolej. Her interesting research is quite reminiscent of things I work on in my project on crime victims in the Swedish press.
Today, we are presenting a new research project called DVIS – Domestic Violence and the Internet in Sweden. The goal of this project is to map how victims of domestic violence in Sweden are using the internet and social media both to find information and to connect with networks of people that they may not otherwise have access to when living in situations of domestic violence.
I am now on my way home from the international conference on 
